The BUILD UP blog: discuss, praise, disagree.

BUILD UP provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post their personal articles, opinions, questions and answers related to the community themes. Your point of view is what makes BUILD UP relevant to other building professionals and public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and respond to others' posts.

Prior to posting, please read carefully the Rules of Conduct and Legal Notice found at the footer of this page.

30 May 2010 | 0 replies | 634 visits

Hello

We should be careful not to overestimate the possible outcome from heating system inspections. If you read the current EPBD directive it looks like the recommendations expected from a heating system inspection are the same as from an energy certificate. I don't think you can get the same results. Heating system inspection can reasonably trigger further investigation if there is an evidence of big problems. Example: high actual consumption. Then, who cares for the building? There is heating system, ventilation system, air conditioning inspection but no "building inspection...".

I would suggest that regular maintenance of systems should be compulsory instead, including a simple check of actual consumption versus design o certified values. If there is a significantly higher actual consumption, reasons should be investigated.

This could be very simple: just join certificates database with energy distributors database. 

By the way, this would be very effective, independent, cheap and straight to the objective (less actual consumption) way to check certificates....

This item has not yet been commented. Please feel free to send us a comment of your own.

Most Active Users

Gilles VAILLE (PRACSIS)
Dick van Dijk  (TNO Energy and Comfort Systems)
Alexander Deliyannis (SYMPRAXIS Team)