ASIEPI stands for 'Assessment and Improvement of the EPBD Impact (for new buildings and building renovation)'. The EU Intelligent Europe SAVE project addressed 6 technical issues in connection with the EPBD implementation: Intercomparison of requirement levels in Member States - Impact, compliance and control of legislation - An effective handling of thermal bridges in the EPBD context - Stimulation of good building and ductwork airtightness through EPBD - The EPBD as support for market uptake for innovative systems - Stimulation of better summer comfort and reduced energy consumption for cooling by EPBD implementation.
EPBD requires Member States to define building energy
performance requirements... but did the Member States take this
opportunity to strengthen their existing legislation?
Member
States are free to define their calculation methods and their
requirements... Is it therefore possible to compare requirements across
Europe? If yes, are the requirements from one country more severe than
those of neighbouring countries?
EPBD gives a list of aspects to
consider in the calculation procedures... Practically, how to
effectively handle thermal bridges, stimulate good summer comfort
conditions and good building and duct airtightness?
EPBD should
not be a barrier for innovation. Are there legal and technical
frameworks to assess the energy performance of new innovative systems
not covered by the standard procedures?
Regulations are only
useful if they are respected. How do the Member States organise control
and compliance?
The ASIEPI project (01/10/2007 - 31/03/2010)
analysed those aspects in participating countries, and made
suggestions for improvements.
Comments
This item has not yet been commented. Please feel free to send us a comment of your own.