BUILDUP

energy solutions
for better buildings

Evaluation of compliance and control in different Member States

1840 visits
Show more detailsHide more details
Posting Date | 4 February 2010Publication Date | 2009
Country | Pan European
Geographic Coverage | National
Theme | Energy policies, Legislation, regulations, standards
Target Group | Local/regional/national authorities and facilitators, Building professionals
Type of publication | Information Paper on EPBD
Author(s) | France) , H. Lahmidi (CSTB
Publisher | ASIEPI Project
Number pages | 5
Submitted by Olli Seppänen (Federation of European Heating and Air-conditioning Associations (REHVA))
Tags:ASIEPI | compliance | control | Legislation | EPBD | regusltions
Source Languages | English
Documentation |
application/pdf icon
P179_Synthesis_Compliance_Control_ASIEPI_WP3-final.pdf
(167.7 KB)

Evaluation of compliance and control in different Member States

Requirement levels are an important instrument to improve the energy efficiency of the building stock, but it is definitely not enough. With no compliance, the energy efficiency of the building stock will not improve. In the framework of the ASIEPI project, funded by the Community’s Intelligent Energy Europe programme, a study has been set up to collect information on compliance and control of energy performance legislation in the Member States. This paper presents the synthesis of results.

To achieve compliance with the EP-requirements, the responsibilities of the various actors are defined in the EPB-regulations of each country. While some variations exist the procedures are similar. It varies from the simple check of completeness of documents to a random check at the
construction site or both of them. In general, controls are handled in the following way. They are performed by state or federal employees who are allowed to visit any building during the construction or after its termination. Control campaigns are systematic in Danemark, Finland, Netherlands, Belgium (Flanders) and Norway. It is based on analysis of plans, specifications, or/and calculations. In Norway and Belgium (Flanders), energy performance declaration are generally submitted and checked electronically. In Belgium (Flanders), complementary to the systematic control, autorities execute a second control based on random.

Information Paper P179 of ASIEPI European project

URL | http://www.asiepi.eu

© European Communities 2008
Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged.
The views expressed are not an official position of the European Commission.
Disclaimer