The Commission is in the process of updating some of the content on this website in light of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union. If the site contains content that does not yet reflect the withdrawal of the United Kingdom, it is unintentional and will be addressed.

Do we have an example of a country where airtightness is good without any regulations requirement?

Share this Post:
Sweden does not use its building regulations to impose its strict requirements on ductwork airtightness. Rather it is a voluntary trade standard (the AMA VVS specifications) that has driven the market transformation to more airtight ventilation systems. This trade standard is used in virtually all building projects.

Norway is another example of a country where good products are used (predominantly round ductwork with pre-fitted gasket seals, giving leakage class C) without any explicit requirement in the building regulations, and where duct leakage is not taken into account in the energy performance calculations.  The reason for this is historic. Up until maybe 15 years ago, Norway had explicit requirements in its building trade specifications, just as Sweden, but this is no longer deemed necessary because almost all products on in the Scandinavian market are quality airtight ductwork anyway.

For more information you can check-out the following:

  •  Information Paper P187 “Duct System Air Leakage — How Scandinavia tackled the problem” by P.G.Schild & J.Railio, on the BUILDUP website
  •  Final technical report from project ASIEPI, Work Package 5, see www.asiepi.eu